Alexander the Great - One Of The Best Leaders - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 918 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/04/07 Category History Essay Level High school Topics: Alexander The Great Essay Did you like this example? Alexander the Great was born in Macedonia in a Greek kingdom. As a kid, he was taught a variety of subjects such as government, philosophy, and poetry from Aristotle. Learning these subjects as a young child helped Alexander conquer nations later in his life. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Alexander the Great One Of The Best Leaders" essay for you Create order Alexander led his military into numerous victories and never accepted defeat once. Alexander defeated the Persians even while being outnumbered after he continued his victories in Afghanistan and India. Alexander the Great had a great behavior toward leadership, he led his military to many victories with a purpose and common stake which made him team management. He was people focused and focused on long-term goals making him a transformation leader. He carried the situational leadership trait due to his actions. And finally, Alexander contained many different adaptive leadership traits which resulted in him being such a successful man. Alexander was a team manager because of his success in conquering and defeating countries. He accomplished the perfect military by having committed troops. He earned his followers trust and respect by showing them that the mission was not just about himself and provided self-care to his army. He did not tolerate raping, stealing, or using violence toward one another. This didnt only make his army respect him as a leader, but it allowed each troop to respect one another. Alexander also allowed his men to believe in their own religion and had different religious groups. This was a cause of everyone building relationships and had a beneficial outcome of respect. He also demonstrated team manager leadership characteristics by being inspiring and addressing his troops to a problem before it was yet to happen. Alexander and his military were all on the same page and knew the main purpose, which was spreading the Greek culture. Alexander the Great, in my opinion, was in between transactional leadership and transformational leadership. I say this because he was very task focused and success was awarded, but he was also very people focused and focused on long-term goals. However, Alexander was mostly a transformational leader in the end. He was a transformation leader for many reasons, one being that he was people focused. He would take care of his troops and be sure that they were well fed and healthy. He also would not allow rape, stealing, or violence with each other. He was also very inspiring, he knew by inspiring his troops and giving them the motivation needed that they would follow him. Alexander and his military were focused on long-term goals, which was conquering the middle east and spreading the Greek culture, he was also set on contacting the west and east to increase trade and sharing ideas. Alexander was able to develop relationships with the idea of free religion. He contained many great attri butes which resulted in Alexander in being a transformational leader. Alexander was a situation leader because he focused on two main things, Task behavior and relationship behavior. He developed a relationship with his men by putting himself through the same pain everyone else was going through. As an example, they were traveling through the desert and everyone was suffering from thirst. All the troops gathered the last of the water they had and gave it to Alexander. He got the water and threw it into the sand. He did this to show his men that he was going to suffer with them and he was going to go through the same pain as everyone else. This created a strong relationship and gave them confidence. He also provided emotional support to his men. He would always address the problem to his troops beforehand or before it escalated. Alexander contained many different adaptive leadership characteristics. He was very confident in himself and in his military. While leading his troops into Persia he knew that they were outnumbered, and the odds were against him. But because he was confident in his army they pushed forward and resulted in a surprising victory. He was also very driven, Alexander had the will to conquer and defeat many different countries and spread the Greek culture. He showed tolerance by allowing his troops to have a freedom of religion. He demonstrated self-awareness because at times he knew that his army was outnumbered, and he was lacking men, but he knew they were stronger and more proficient than any other army. He was very much a risk taker because he insisted in traveling even while him and his men were hurting of thirst and hunger, also because he battled the Persians when he could have easily lost the battle because of the lack of troops compared to Persia. He was a great communicator and m ade sure everyone knew the plan and what was happening. By never losing a battle and always coming out with a victorious win he showed that he was tactically and technically proficient. After all it is easy to see how Alexander the Great was one of the best leaders in history. He was proficient in leading his armies to countless victories and never allowing defeat to cross his path. He demonstrated the leader characteristics needed to become this successful. He was also very adaptive and didnt let obstacles become an issue that most people would. Alexander wasnt just known for his victories in conquering countries, but also known for taking care of his men and earning respect, this is what made Alexander the Great go down in history as one of the be military leaders this world has seen.

How Education Is The Key Focus On Improving Test Scores

For many years the government has played a role in how education was run. For decades, politics has placed its focus on student test scores, how to increase those test scores, and standards that must be followed in order to achieve the goals the politicians have set. Early childhood education has been the key focus on improving test scores. According to the politics, test scores must meet above average levels in order for students to become college and career ready. Greater emphasize is pushed on math and reading levels to improve before students reach middle grade classes. Politics took more control and are now pressing for state standardized test to prove student improvements and well as school improvement. The government has†¦show more content†¦Developed in 2001 but signed by President Bush in 2002, the NCLB was designed to include all children the right to the same education, including those with disabilities (Educational Technology, 2012). It was designed to pro vide parents more options and better teaching methods for their children with disabilities (Educational Technology, 2012). It described how and what students would be learning and assessments given to prove their success. The NCLB was designed with academic standards categorized by each individual state. By the 2005 school year, all states were to prove their assessments for language arts and math in grades 3-8 every year, then once during their high school years. By the 2007 school year, science assessments became mandatory. Although the NCLB were designed to include children with disabilities, they were still expected to partake in the assessments, even if it meant providing accommodations for them. Some accommodations could include students with disabilities receiving extra time on test, having a small group management, having test questions read aloud to them or allowing them to take extra breaks during the test (No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB): An Overview, 2014). Since a ll schools were to prove a 100 percent annual measurable objective by the end of the 2013 school year, most states had to apply for a waiver to change their passing rates from 100 percent to a more realistic goal. Schools argued that the goals for all

Clustering Competence in Emotional Intelligence

Question: Discuss about the Clustering Competence in Emotional Intelligence. Answer: Introduction: Globalisation refers to the joining hands of markets of the world in order to become a larger global market (Beck, 2015). Internationalisation refers to the process of investment made by businesses in the international markets. This is done by modifying products and services in such a way that the audiences of different cultures can accept the same easily. In the past two decades, the two processes i.e. globalisation and internationalisation has evolved with a rapid pace which has brought new business and employment opportunities for each country and its citizens (Streitwieser, 2014). Emergence of these two processes is because of the innovations of technology as this has been the major driving force which has led to the growth of globalisation and internationalisation. Some other driving factors are the transportation, communication, demand for global products and processes increase in the purchasing power of people and the regulations and policies are made flexible by the governmen t of different countries. The challenges that the professionals faces are majorly the communication barriers as it is crucial for them to understand the thoughts and opinions of people from all over the world. In addition to this, it has become easy to communicate with people of another country but the problem occurs with the transmission and understanding of the thoughts of people with totally different cultures, languages and backgrounds. Here, the gaps in conveying and interpreting thoughts occur irrespective of people interacting in English language daily because of the less developed global communication skills. In addition to this, there are various types of communication it can be written, verbal, non-verbal which is different because of different cultures. Therefore; the professionals are required to understand firstly the cultural differences as they can change the whole meaning of the communication if the global communication skills of a person are not up to date (McCormick, 2016). In the Emotional Intelligence model consists of five components that are: Self-awareness, Self-regulation, Motivation, Empathy and Social-skill. Further these consist of their respective competencies. The cluster of Self-Awareness comprises of further three competencies that are emotional self-awareness, accurate self-assessment and self-confidence (Boyatzis, Goleman and Rhee, 2015). The Self-awareness component talks about how much an individual is aware of his emotions, assessment includes strengths and weaknesses of an individual and the confidence that one possesses. Self-awareness is all how an individual is aware of oneself and also how the person assesses oneself in different situations which will help the person in possessing a consistent personality rather than a split personality. The very first competency is the Emotional self-awareness where individuals analyses the emotional strength of a person. Emotional fit refers to when a person has full control on their emotions and feelings moreover, they are never carried away by their emotions and are able to get over it. The second competency is the accurate self-assessment where a person is said to be aware of ones strengths, weakness, needs and drives. The third competency is the self-confidence i.e. how an individual is confident about decisions, behaviour basically confident about oneself. In addition to have a high degree of self-awareness the person should be aware about their behaviour and reactions that they answer in different situations (Wolff, 2005). Self-awareness also discusses that how an individuals feelings can affect others, oneself and their job-performance. Self-awareness help individuals to know about their feelings better as to when they are happy stressed, anger, anxious etc (Goleman, Boyatzis and McKee, 2013). Knowing better of ones feelings will help in building good interpersonal relations and active communication. It can affect professional communication because if people will be not being aware of their behaviour then it will lead to stress and differences among peers. The more an individual will be aware of self the more effective will be the communication as this will ensure a healthy relation between people at workplace. The person who is low on self-awareness which includes all the three competencies of emotional self-awareness, accurate self-assessment and self-confidence will never be able to maintain a strong professional communication because the person who is not aware of oneself will never be perceived r ight by others. Therefore; it is important that individual should be confident and open to ones own behaviour and how one is stable emotionally as a person. Communication is included in the social skills cluster because it is linked with social intelligence. It includes an individuals social behaviour which makes the persons existence in the society on the basis of ones communication skills. People recognises the ones who are socially open and have a good compatibility with others and this will be possible only when a person will be open to express ones own views and opinions in any of the social communications. Communication is that part which should neither be excessive nor be less as it is required to be appropriate in order to motivate people to act upon what is communicated to them (Patricia, 2015). Communication is said to be the driving force between all the three components that are the self-regulation, motivation and empathy as without communication the will be no synchronisation in all these three components (Greene and Burleson, 2013). Communication is pervasive as it present in all the other competencies also and not only in social skills because it is needed everywhere. Communication helps in developing and maintaining good interpersonal relationships at workplace and everywhere. It helps in building strong social networks. There are different forms of communication like written, verbal and non-verbal. All these are liked to be followed during different situations; verbal communication is the most common of them which is accompanied by the non-verbal like gestures, facial expressions, body language etc. A leader is said to be a good leader when the one is well-verse in communication because it includes both listening and speaking skills. They both are required to be in t he right form as the communication should not lack when needed and at the same time it should not be excessive when not required. In self-regulation the person is checked upon that how one is able to modify ones own behaviour with respect to the change in external environment; here, the person builds a strong communication with oneself. Motivation is related to communication because it explains that how a person deals with any situation because a self-motivated and optimist person will always have an effective influence and communication with others. Empathy is dealing with the emotions of others as people can only maintain strong interpersonal relationships with others only with the help of effective communication skills (Batool, 2013). Empathic communication will make personal and professional relations sound and positive. Therefore; good communication will always show empathy to others. From the Emotional Intelligence model, the empathy competency is found to be the best for functioning as a professional because it is required in order to build a strong network with people at workplace. It is needed for maintaining relationships with others. It provides a better understanding the other peoples ideas, vision and perspectives which will enable to have good and positive relations with peers and employees. It will help to relate with the problems and emotions of employees so that they feel supportive and motivated for their work. This will improve the performance of the group as an empathic leader will always motivate followers to give productive performance and also makes the work environment enjoyable and pleasant. This will be the best competency as it will bind all the people working under a leader from different cultures and backgrounds (Northouse, 2012). Empathic leader is always liked by the followers as they feel more related to the leader at the same time, invest their energy into the work to give better performance (Riggio and Reichard, 2008). This will help in bringing out the best in the followers and make the proper and efficient utilisation of their talents and capabilities. Empathy will give the ability to the leader to look into the emotions and perspectives of the followers. This will help to make the wise decisions which will be good for all in the organisation. It will help in building a trust relationship between leader and followers. Empathy will make the image of the leader as that of the one who serves the followers rather than imposing decisions and orders on to them. This will develop a sense of belongingness among the followers for the leader and the organisation which will then in return enhance the job performance of each one (Assanova and McGuire, 2009). References Beck, U., 2015. What is globalization?. John Wiley Sons. Boyatzis, R. E., Goleman, D., and Rhee, K. 2015. Clustering competence in emotional intelligence: Insights from the Emotional Competence Inventory. Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations. pp. 343-362. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. and McKee, A., 2013. Primal leadership: Unleashing the power of emotional intelligence. Harvard Business Press. Wolff, S, B., 2005. Emotional Competence Inventory (ECI). Hay Group. From https://www.eiconsortium.org/pdf/ECI_2_0_Technical_Manual_v2.pdf. Northouse, P.G., 2012. Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage. Riggio, R.E. and Reichard, R.J., 2008. The emotional and social intelligences of effective leadership: An emotional and social skill approach. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(2), pp.169-185. Assanova, M and McGuire, M., 2009. Applicability Analysis of the Emotional Intelligence Theory. INDIANA UNIVERSITY. From https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.472.8431rep=rep1type=pdf. Batool, B, F., 2013. Emotional Intelligence and Effective Leadership. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly. Vol 4, No 3. Greene, J, O and Burleson, B, R., 2013. Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills. Psychology Press. Patricia, O., 2015. Improving Interpersonal Relationship in Workplaces. IOSR Journal of Research Method in Education. 5(6). pp 115-125. McCormick, A., 2016. Changing Contexts in Comparative and International Education: Geopolitical Shifts and Research in Australia. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives Vol 15, No 1, pp. 1-4. Streitwieser, B. ed., 2014, May. Internationalisation of higher education and global mobility. Symposium Books Ltd.